Platform Module
Track risks, mapped controls, and treatment progress in one governed view with audit-ready evidence trails.
Maintain a live risk register aligned to control effectiveness and audit findings for executive visibility.
Product Preview
Product Preview
Workflow Ribbon
Governed execution stages
1Plan
2Execute
3Review
4Close
- Risk scoring and treatment plan tracking
- Risk-control linkage for governance reviews
- Program-level dashboards for leadership
Why risk registers fail governance teams
- Risk records are disconnected from active audit findings and CAPA actions.
- Scoring is inconsistent across teams and cannot be defended during reviews.
- Leadership sees static snapshots rather than operational risk movement.
- Approval checkpoints are not consistently tied to lifecycle stage transitions.
- Teams lack a single operating view of evidence quality, CAPA progress, and report readiness.
- Escalation signals for overdue actions and SLA breaches are visible too late.
Risk governance workflow
Record risk context
Owner: Risk Owner
Capture threat, vulnerability, impact, likelihood, and existing controls.
Link to controls and findings
Owner: Audit Team
Connect risk records to evidence, tests, and active findings.
Assign treatment plans
Owner: GRC Lead
Define mitigation, transfer, or acceptance decisions with dates.
Review residual posture
Owner: CISO
Validate residual risk and approve closure or escalation.
Define audit scope and ownership
Owner: GRC Lead
Lock scope, controls, stakeholders, and due dates before execution starts.
Execute control checks and evidence collection
Owner: Audit Team
Capture evidence against mapped controls with quality checkpoints.
Feature Grid
Structured risk scoring
Normalize inherent and residual risk calculations for governance reviews.
Control and finding linkage
Connect risk entries to control status and audit outcomes.
Treatment tracking
Monitor action ownership and due dates to ensure risk closure.
Governance approvals and state transitions
Control stage progression with explicit approval gates and audit logs.
Explore capabilityFramework catalog and mapping controls
Map and reuse controls across standards with governed catalog updates.
Explore capabilityAudit analytics dashboard
Track overdue items, SLA status, risk heatmap, and stage health in one view.
Explore capabilityTeam and timeline management
Coordinate auditors, SMEs, and control owners through role-scoped workflows.
Explore capabilityReport export and secure distribution
Generate DOCX, HTML, and PDF outputs with controlled URL sharing.
Explore capabilityScreenshots and Visuals
Show risk posture, treatment SLA, and framework-linked exposure trends.
Module View
Risk heatmap
Stage transitions for this module
1Plan
2Execute
3Review
4Close
Capability View
treatment dashboard
Execution metrics by stage and owner
Ready8
In progress5
At risk2
Overdue1
ROI Metrics
Cycle-time reduction
20-35%Faster movement from planning to report closure with governed workflows.
Overdue finding reduction
25-40%Early escalation and ownership controls reduce pending critical items.
CAPA closure velocity
1.6x fasterStructured ownership and evidence-backed sign-off improve closure rates.
Evidence completeness
90%+ readinessControl-linked evidence templates reduce missing or invalid submissions.
Approval turnaround
<48 hoursGovernance approvals and stage transitions remove bottlenecks.
Security Note
Audit trails
User actions, approvals, and lifecycle transitions are logged for accountability.
Role permissions
RBAC controls enforce who can edit plans, approve closures, and access reports.
Evidence controls
Evidence is tagged, linked to controls, and governed through structured review states.
Approval logs
Plan approvals, rejection comments, and closure approvals are retained for verification.
Secure sharing
Report delivery supports controlled URL access and enterprise-safe distribution.
FAQ
Can we track audit stages and approvals?
Yes. Stage transitions and approvals are tracked with timestamps and user accountability.
Do you support evidence-to-control linking?
Yes. Evidence can be mapped to controls and findings so reviewers can validate relevance quickly.
Can we manage CAPA in the same workspace?
Yes. Findings can be converted into corrective/preventive actions with owner and due-date tracking.
Can we run multiple audits at the same time?
Yes. Teams can operate multiple audits in parallel with separate scope, owners, and stage tracking.
Does the platform support role-based workflows?
Yes. Workflows can be configured for audit leads, reviewers, control owners, and stakeholders.
Is there a dashboard for portfolio oversight?
Yes. Oversight views summarize audit progress, overdue actions, and closure status.